In the ever-competitive world of fashion, many apparel companies are striving to build brand recognition and market share. But behind these strategic efforts, are there hidden issues that overlook the real concerns of consumers? The question is increasingly relevant, especially in a country like China, where textile production is massive, yet quality assurance remains inconsistent.
According to recent data, only 45% of clothing companies submit their products to domestic commodity and fiber inspection systems annually. Additionally, private and third-party testing accounts for just about 5%, meaning that less than half of the products in the domestic textile market undergo any form of official quality check. This lack of oversight raises serious concerns about product safety and consumer trust.
Take Tianjin as an example—only 10% of garment companies send their products to the National Quality Inspection Center for evaluation. That leaves 90% of companies bypassing formal quality checks, often relying on verbal commitments rather than documented proof of safety. These products then enter the market without proper verification, posing potential risks to end-users.
Why do so many manufacturers avoid quality inspections? Tang Xiangtao, deputy director of the National Garment Quality Supervision and Inspection Center (Tianjin), explains that the cost of testing can be prohibitive. For small factories, the annual cost of testing could range from 400,000 to 500,000 yuan, a significant expense. To cut costs, many choose to skip the process, gambling on luck. If they’re caught, fines are relatively low compared to the cost of testing—ranging from 5,000 to 10,000 yuan.
Well-known brands, on the other hand, tend to prioritize quality testing to protect their reputation. However, smaller businesses often neglect this step, focusing more on short-term profits than long-term brand value.
The quality monitoring system includes self-control, mandatory sampling by national agencies, and commercial inspections. While some large retailers require third-party reports, many independent traders or foreign importers don’t. For startups with limited budgets, even basic testing can seem like an “astronomical†expense.
Testing agencies fall into three categories: state-owned, private, and foreign-invested. State-run labs have transparent pricing, while private ones may offer competitive rates. Foreign labs, however, charge higher fees due to international certifications, which can make them seem more “global†but also more expensive.
In Tianjin, for instance, testing a single piece of cashmere fabric can cost between 400 to 700 yuan, depending on color fastness. A Japanese lab, however, charges 1,330 yuan with no discounts, citing global recognition as justification. Such high costs deter many SMEs from participating in formal testing.
As a result, many companies set up in-house testing departments, conducting their own quality checks. But these “first-party†tests are not always reliable, and the results may not reflect true quality. Without independent verification, the risk of substandard products reaching the market increases.
Third-party labs, such as national inspection centers, provide impartial and legally valid results. Yet, many brands opt to skip this step, especially in fast fashion, where quick turnaround is essential. With frequent style changes and small batch sizes, the cost and time of testing can be too high to justify.
This leads to a cycle of risk and compromise, where quality is often sacrificed for speed and profit. Even globally recognized brands have faced quality scandals, highlighting the need for stronger oversight and transparency.
Ultimately, the challenge lies in balancing cost, speed, and quality. As the industry evolves, finding sustainable solutions that protect both consumers and businesses will be crucial.
Cycling Base Layers,Cycling Vest,Breathable Cycling Vest,Sleeveless Cycling Top,cycling base
Quanzhou Oneo Sports Co., Ltd , https://www.oneosport.com